Concentration Risk
The event nobody saw coming
In nuclear power, the events that permanently rewrote the rules were almost never the ones the industry was defending against. Markets work the same way. For a utility career built on a single stock, that is not a metaphor — it is the whole risk.
Two Minute Portfolio Preparedness Review ContactThe Pattern
It is always the rule nobody thought to write
The American nuclear rulebook was not written in advance. It was written afterward, in the wreckage, one surprise at a time — and never once about the accident the industry had been drilling for.
Markets are assembled the same way. Every rule governing trading, disclosure, and risk today exists because something happened that the people running the system considered impossible the week before it happened.
Five of them. The stories are worth telling properly, because the shape of each one should be familiar to anyone who has watched a portfolio.
By the numbers
Spent at V.C. Summer before the project was abandoned in July 2017. Nothing was built.
Vogtle 3 and 4 as delivered, against an original estimate near $14 billion.
The Dow's loss in a single session on October 19, 1987 — with no news catalyst.
Year-over-year growth in data center power use across Southern's utilities, Q1 2026.
The Fork
Two utilities. One reactor. One bankruptcy filing.
On March 29, 2017, Westinghouse — the company that invented the American pressurized water reactor — filed for Chapter 11, sunk by fixed-price contracts on two AP1000 projects. Nobody in the utility sector had that in a model.
Four months later, one of those projects was abandoned. The other was finished. Same reactor design. Same vendor. Same regulatory era. Same decade.
The road not taken
V.C. Summer
SCANA & Santee Cooper — South Carolina
- Units 2 and 3 abandoned in July 2017 after roughly $9 billion had been spent.
- SCANA was absorbed by Dominion at a fraction of its former value.
- The chief executive later pled guilty to fraud.
- SCANA employees held SCANA stock.
The road taken
Plant Vogtle
Southern Company & Georgia Power — Georgia
- Units 3 and 4 completed in 2023 and 2024, years late and billions over budget.
- Southern absorbed the charges and a long stretch of dead money in the stock.
- The result: roughly 2.2 GW of round-the-clock carbon-free baseload — the only new nuclear built in America in decades.
- It arrived exactly as data centers began paying premiums for precisely that.
The most criticized capital allocation decision of the 2010s became the strategic asset of the 2020s. Nobody forecast that either.
The Committee
Who is actually managing your retirement
If a large part of your net worth sits in one company's stock, then your retirement is being run by a committee. Here is the roster, what each member decides, and how much say you have.
First, the honest part — July 2026
Right now, this committee is voting in your favor.
Vogtle 3 and 4 are running. Data center power consumption across Southern's utilities is up roughly 42% year over year. There are gigawatts of large-load projects under contract with a far larger pipeline behind them, and the capital plan runs to tens of billions through the end of the decade. The most criticized construction project of the 2010s turned out to be the strategic asset of the 2020s. The stock has been re-rated. The dividend went up again.
So nothing on this page feels urgent to you today. Your position is doing well. The board looks smart. The commission is cooperative. The demand is real.
That is not a reason to relax. That is the exact condition under which nobody acts — and it is the condition every man in every story on this page was standing in, right up until the meeting he was not invited to.
These are your portfolio managers. You have never met them. They have never heard of you. Not one of them has ever asked how your retirement is going, and not one of them ever will.
And notice what joined the roster while you were not looking. You did not spend thirty years at a utility in order to own an artificial intelligence company. But a meaningful share of today's optimism rests on the capital budgets of a few firms a long way from here. How much? You don't know. I don't know. Neither, in any honest moment, does the board.
You have exactly one decision on this committee: how much of your life savings you hand over to it.
The Objections
The two reasons you haven't done anything about this
Neither one is stupid. Both are real. And you have probably never said either of them out loud, which is exactly why neither has ever been answered.
"I need the dividend. I can't sell it."
This is the stronger of the two, and it deserves a straight answer rather than a lecture.
A dividend is not a wage. It is a distribution the board votes on, and boards vote both ways. The utility sector has a long record of steady payouts — and it also contains companies that cut, suspended, or eliminated the dividend when the balance sheet demanded it. A dividend is a decision, not a property of the stock.
More to the point: income is a function of the whole portfolio, not of one position. If a concentrated holding is generating the cash flow you live on, the question is not whether to give up income. It is whether the same income can be produced without one company's board holding the vote. Usually it can — and if it can't, you need to know that before you retire, not after.
"I helped build that plant."
You did. That is not nothing, and I am not going to pretend it is.
But loyalty to the company and loyalty to your family are two different obligations, and only one of them is holding the stock. Your company does not own shares of you. It will not adjust its capital plan because of what is in your 401(k). It has never once asked how your retirement is going.
There were people at V.C. Summer who felt exactly the way you feel. They had every reason to. The pride was earned, and the pride was real, and it did not protect a single share.
Selling the stock is not a betrayal of the work. The work is done. It is in the ground, it is on the grid, and nobody can take it from you. The shares are a separate question, and they should be answered separately.
What both of them actually are
The model became invisible
David Bohm was a theoretical physicist — he worked alongside Einstein at Princeton — and he spent the second half of his life on a question that had nothing to do with physics: why do intelligent people fail to update their thinking when the evidence changes?
His answer was that thought is not a neutral observer. Thought builds a model of the world, and then it quietly forgets that it built one. The model stops being a model and starts being reality.
“Thought creates our world and then says, ‘I didn’t do it.’”
David BohmBohm identified three traits of thought that turn dangerous under pressure. Two of them are sitting on this page, in your own words:
- Thought defends its conclusions. Evidence that contradicts the position gets minimized; evidence that confirms it gets amplified. “I need the dividend” is rarely a calculation. It is usually a conclusion looking for support — and it is a conclusion you have never had to defend, because nobody has ever asked you to.
- Thought mistakes the past for the present. Confidence in a position often turns out to be a recording from an earlier experience rather than a fresh read of current conditions. “I helped build that plant” is a true statement about 2013. It is not a statement about 2026, and it was never a statement about your balance sheet.
Bohm called this the systemic fault: the very instrument you would use to check your thinking is the thinking. You bring a biased tool to evaluate whether the tool is biased, and you find nothing wrong. It is not a character flaw. It is how the system is wired — and it is exactly why the operators at Three Mile Island trusted the light instead of the valve.
So here is the question worth writing down. For the position you hold with the strongest conviction: what would have to be true today for this to no longer make sense?
If you cannot answer that easily about your employer stock, Bohm would say the model has already become invisible. That is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to have someone else look.
Read the full Bohm essay →The Discipline
You already know the answer. You practice it at work.
Your industry invented defense in depth. Multiple independent barriers. No single failure permitted to take down the plant — precisely because you cannot forecast which failure you will get. You do not build a reactor around a prediction. You build it so that being wrong is survivable.
“Then you go home to a retirement plan with a single point of failure.”
Concentration in employer stock is not a view on Southern Company. It is a bet that you will land on the Vogtle side of the fork rather than the V.C. Summer side. That bet carries no edge and no information. It carries familiarity — which is not the same thing, and never has been.
And the regime is still moving. In both directions. Palisades is attempting the first restart in American history of a plant already in decommissioning. Three Mile Island Unit 1, shut down in 2019 as uneconomic, is being brought back to power artificial intelligence. Nobody saw that coming either.
Next step
Let's find your single point of failure
A Portfolio Preparedness Review is a straightforward exercise: what percentage of your net worth sits in one employer, what a bad decade does to your withdrawal plan, and what an unwind actually costs after tax. No product. No commission.
Bailey Financial Services, Inc. is a state-registered investment adviser. Information on this page is educational and general in nature and is not investment, tax, or legal advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security. References to specific companies, projects, or historical events are illustrative only and are not an endorsement, a forecast, or a prediction of future results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Advisory services are offered only to clients or prospective clients where Bailey Financial Services, Inc. and its representatives are properly registered or exempt from registration.